That PJ wrote:Simple simon- You're not the only one that pushed my wagon yesterday, but you were the one that really pushed us to a threatened state after our role reveal. Meta4 did, too, but I've come to expect his uninformed and often human-destructive behavior in games. Not so with you. We knew that we'd have to look carefully at anyone who tried to push us to a tie since they would be trying to force us to bury a human, and lo and behold, you did exactly that. Now, the very next day, you're calling for us on the lynch again, which will go down exactly the same route, forcing us to act in self-defense. It's a very effective way to control our voting bloc, I admit, but it's exactly what I'd expect a Network player to do to get a lynch-one-kill-two freebie. Bonus points if one of us come up runner-up, making our 'reward' meaningless.
I know we're also looking for a new Network player today, but I don't have any bright ideas for that candidate yet. As far as the occasional "Network will surely claim the Twins" comments, let me spell it out for you: That would be insane with the amount of heat we're getting. We absolutely knew that being forced into a role claim would lead to our demise one way or another, so let me make the analysis easy for all of you:
- If Night 11 rolls around and we're not Networked, we will be the first to die.
- If Day 12 rolls around and we haven't been killed by the Network, humans should probably lynch us, because there is a high likelihood that we're robots.
Any attempt to get us killed before those points is misguided, or the work of the Network trying to eliminate us before our votes can hurt them. There are real Networked players to hit who are far more dangerous than our known and fairly trivial-to-manipulate voting power. If we do get Networked, we will be extremely easy to spot later in the game--basically a guaranteed freebie for the humans. It's not something I think that they'll do.))
You should really look into that reading comprehension bro, not once did I push you as a wagon. I didn't discuss you, nor does ... Subject: Round 2: The Old Familiar
Simple_Simon wrote:ThatPJ for the tie.
...that indicate to me that I was particularly interested in your demise. You see when I'm not 100% certain about something I tend to just hold my posts on it. There was talk yesterday about one or both of you being inducted into the network, if one of you didn't start there.
That's beside the point however, because at the time when I finally voted these were my options ...
Vote for DoM and seal his fate. Not interested in this since I don't have a read on him one way or the other. I'd certainly hate to be the guy to kill off a human for sure (unlike you).
I could vote for you and retie you with DoM. You'd have to take your chances with RND and hopefully we get something useful out of the deal.
I could have voted rekard to tie with you (at 3 votes), but rekard has been contributing. Perhaps his timing is a bit quick, but I don't feel we have a wolf here.
I could have voted San to tie with you (at 3 votes), San however, as usual, isn't ringing any bells.
I could have voted Hellheart to tie with you (at 3 votes), however I don't trust the default, "no one else to lynch, let's lynch hellheart" idea.
or I could have tossed my vote on one of the singletons or form a new singleton.
From my point of view the only vote with value was to push you back into a tie. We even learned that you feel your survival is paramount to all humans (as stated above and actioned on day 1 and day 2). You feel your survival is too important to take a chance with RND. Your argument that you're not a networker or that one of you isn't is simply unconvincing. You're even willing to threaten us with further use of your voting power should we continue to vote for you.
Now the astute among you will have noticed I retracted my earlier vote. Why did I do this? Two reasons, I don't even recall putting that vote in there (heh, <redacted> posting) and as I mentioned in that post we need to steamroll you to prevent that power from being used (doesn't look like it's happening at the moment) and to underline the main point of that post.
A vigilante should shoot you dead in the face, where you stand today. Even if you're on our side, you're not, and that's a dangerous thing.
For what it's worth, though, his talking to himself is awfully entertaining.-sphen
he is a master bullshitter so he could just take things out of his own ass or whatever comes from his mind to argue.-Rekard